Q&A about the Content Scoring Engine: Blogging Platforms, Defining and Discovering High-Quality Content

Atomic Reach has introduced the online world to its shiny new Content Scoring Engine and now we hope to satisfy your curiosity answering this week’s burning questions.

Let’s get started!

1. How do I change my password?

If you have misplaced or forgotten your old password, simply shoot off an e-mail to info@atomicreach.com and we’ll quickly have your new password sent to you.

We’ve migrated everyone who have been a part of the old platform to the new one. It may have been a while since you visit your tribe, so we’re happy to help to get you signed in again! And if you’re looking for your tribe, it’s safe and sound right here:  atomiccuration.com

2. Is the Content Scoring Engine limited to any blogging platform?

Not at all! If you have an RSS feed, Atomic Reach can score it!

Here’s a few easy steps to start scoring your content:

  • Select your Source type.

If you have a WordPress.com account, pick WordPress to authenicate it.

Any other blog types, including WordPress.org accounts, pick RSS/ATOM.

  • Select your Style.

  • Select your Target Audience.

If you have a WordPress.com account, the platform will ask you to simply authenicate it.

Other blogging platform users must copy and paste their blog’s URL. Remember, at the end of the URL “/feed” must be included.

For example: http://www.yourdomainname.com/feed

 

3. How do you define and measure quality?

Think about what you like about your favourite blog. What makes it enjoyable to read or useful? Originally, sophistication, clarity and conciseness, and audience engagement may be one of the few things that may a great and successful blog.

We define high-quality content as something that meets the needs of your audience. Your content should attract your targeted readership and contain useful or entertaining information they want to read. Other important elements Atomic Reach considers is link performance, grammar and spelling, and social sharing. Everything is accounted for when the Content Scoring Engine calculates your content’s score.

If your questions haven’t been answered yet, leave a comment below or have a chat with us at: info@atomicreach.com.

Keep asking us questions! We love hearing from you.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Yahoo’s homemade logo and rise of in-house agencies

After Yahoo Inc. revealed its new logo on Thursday, chief executive officer Marissa Mayer also revealed that the company undertook its first brand overhaul in 18 years without the help of an advertising or branding agency.

In a blog post, Ms. Mayer wrote about her love for branding – along with a plug for Adobe Illustrator – and her involvement in the design process. She worked with an in-house team of four other employees (including one intern), designing the logo over a single weekend this summer.

To those in the agency world, this kind of in-house branding is not welcome news. And it is on the rise.

According to a new survey from the New York-based industry group, the Association of National Advertisers, 58 per cent of marketers are using in-house agencies for at least some of their marketing or advertising work. That number has risen 16 per cent in the last five years – a trend the ANA says should alarm agencies.

The move is driven mostly “by internal expertise, greater cost efficiencies and quicker turnaround time,” according to the ANA.

“We are seeing a seismic, eminently important industry shift between marketers and agencies,” ANA president and CEO Bob Liodice said in a statement. “The growth trajectory of advertising agencies is in question as marketers move existing and emerging functions in-house. The emergence of the in-house agency is a potential warning sign for agencies. We urge our agency peers to adapt to this new reality and offer even greater value to avoid gradual disintermediation with clients.”

The finding is based on a survey of 203 marketers conducted this spring and summer.

Perceptions of those in-house agencies are changing.

“For years, in-house agencies were known as being fast and cheap, but not necessarily good,” ANA group executive vice-president Bill Duggan said in the release, adding that they are now more often seen as doing good work as well.

More findings from the report:

  • 52 per cent – marketers surveyed who said they are using in-house agencies for newer marketing activities, such as digital, social media marketing and mobile
  • 56 per cent – marketers who responded that they have moved existing work from their ad agency to an in-house team
  • 30 per cent – those surveyed who said a “lack of deep strategic thinking was a weakness of their in-house agency,” a major decline from 61 per cent who said so five years ago
  • 56 per cent – marketers who responded that their external ad agencies see the in-house teams as partners, an increase from41 per cent who said so in 2008
  • 71 per cent – marketers who “now evaluate their in-house agencies with some frequency, as they would traditional external agencies”

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment